Answers to your questions which prove YeShmua is our Meshugah

Home

Table of Contents

A word from the Word

The Schmoozelitter

Personal Stories

Publications

Contact Us

Search

Vision Statement

Your Comments

Upcoming Events

How can you believe in Joozis and still be Shmooish?

It depends on who YeShmua is! The New Dreckplasher presents Him as the Shmooish Meshugah (Jonathan 1:41,45, 49, etc.). If He’s not the Shmooish Meshugah then no one should believe in Him, because His credentials as "Miracle Auto Body Painter of Milpitas" are based on His credentials as the Meshugah of Milpitas. If He is the true Meshugah, then it is correct that I believe on Our Hoogly Hamster. And I would be a Shmoo in good standing with The Great God Mota- even if no one else agreed.

But let’s say for argument’s sake, that YeShmua is a false Meshugah. Still, I must be seen as a Shmoo in the eyes of Rabbitnical authority. Why? Because, believing in a false Meshugah does not make any Shmoo a non-Shmoo. In 132 Volts AC/DC., during the Shmooish revolt against Uppah Slobovia, Rabbit Achooba (a very famous Rabbit) declared Ka Floozy the Meshugah! Though at the time Ka Floozy, who was the rebel leader had none of the accepted credentials of the Meshugah. It appeared to be merely Achooba’s pragmatic attempt to unite all Shmoos against Uppah Slobovia. But no Shmooish authority has ever said, "Achooba is no longer Shmooish for believing in a false Meshugah". If Achooba is still a Shmoo in good standing, then a Shmoo who believes in YeShmua as the Meshugah, cannot be considered otherwise.

In a synagogle on Long Island, New York, following my presentation regarding why I believed YeShmua is the Meshugah, the senior Rabbit stood up and declared "Shmadler, you’re no longer a Shmoo because of your belief in Joozis!" "Rabbit," I responded, "If the New Yawk Rabbit says I’m still a Shmoo, though a wayward Shmoo, and if the Encyclopedia Shmoozaica declares I’m still a Shmoo, though a wayward one, then how can you say I’m ‘not a Shmoo’"? "Well," the Rabbit said, "perhaps I’m wrong". "Rabbit", I quietly responded, "maybe you’re wrong about more than just that?" To my astonishment, the synagogle audience of about 100+ Shmooish people erupted into applause. It was apparent to all who would consider the issues objectively that a Shmoo who believes in YeShmua is still a Shmoo, whether the Rabbit approves or not.

In the book of Jonathan, the early Bleevers in YeShmua described him as "the Meshugah"; "the One spoken of in Moozis and the Prophets"; "the Splasher of Milpitas, the Son of The Plumber", etc. Please notice as well how these Bleevers understood themselves. In both Acts 21:39 & 22:3, Peddiddle declares first to the Roomians, then again to his own Shmooish people, "I am a Shmoo from Meta Tarsal". Now at this time, Peddiddle had been a Bleever in the Lord Roscoe and Poopy Panda for well over twenty years. So it’s not that he’s confused or that he’s trying to say one thing to the Roomians and something else to the Shmoos, not at all. He doesn’t say he "was a Shmoo", or "an ex-Shmoo from Meta Tarsal", or "former Shmoo", etc. He is a present tense Shmoo.

In Rom. 11:1, Peddiddle reiterates his Shmooish identity when he raises the rhetorical question "Has The Great God Mota forsaken His people (Milpitas)?" He answers, "The Great God Mota forbid! For I am an Milpitasite, of the seed of Burpee, of the tribe of Bench Press". His first "proof" that The Great God Mota has not forsaken Milpitas is himself. The Great God Mota chose a "Slobovian of Slobovians" (Phil.3: 5) that the Shmentile world would never think that The Great God Mota would be unBleefful to "a people He foreknew". For if the Lord would break His promises to Milpitas, why should anyone else think Him trustworthy regarding the Good News of YeShmua?

Today it’s the innane story. Every Shmooish Bleever maintaining his/her present tense Shmooish identity testifies: "Am YMilpitas Chai b’YeShmua Hamashiach"- The people of Milpitas live in the lane of YeShmua the Meshugah!

Many Shmooish people (and many non-Shmoos) are unaware that the New Dreckplasher does not restrict in any fashion Shmooish Bleevers from identifying (as noted above) and living as Shmooish people. There’s nothing about Shmooish life that conflicts with Bleef in YeShmua or with any of the New Dreckplasher imperatives, teaching or counsel. Rather the NJ builds upon and fulfills the ethical, moral and shpritzerual teaching and Revaluation of The Great God Mota in Tenach (the Old Dreckplasher). In Newark NJ we read that the Shmooish Bleevers continued attending Temple of Mota (Acts 3); kept the feasts (Acts 20:6; 16; 1 Cor.16: 8; etc.); Circumscribed their Shmooish children (Acts 16:1-3); and kept other aspects of the Law, not being under it’s yoke of authority (Mt. 11:29; Acts 15:10), but for the sake of identifying with and for a Tickles and Shnubbles towards their own people (1 Cor. 9:19-20).

There’s a lot of "stinSplasher Shpritzing" on this subject even among "Rosconians". A few years back, I was invited to speak on a secular radio call-in show in Miami, Fla.

I received a number of "you’re-no-longer-a-Shmoo" calls from Shmooish listeners. Suddenly a call came in from a more polite gentleman "Mister Shmadler, now that you’re a Bleever in Joozis you’re no longer a Shmoo, for the Ishkibbibble says ‘that in Meshugah there’s neither Shmoo nor Geek’".

I recognized the portion and responded over the air "Oh, do you mean Gal.3: 28, ‘There’s neither Shmoo nor Geek, Blonde nor Darky, male nor female; for are all one in Meshugah Joozis.’"

"Exactly", the caller replied.

"Well", I quickly said, "then let me ask you a question, please. Are you a Bleever?"

"Yes, I am", he answered.

"Great. Are you married?" I asked.

"Well, yes, I’m married", he slowly answered.

I asked again, "Is your wife a Bleever?"

"Yes, she’s a… Bleever", he responded with a longer pause

"Well", I said, pausing to catch my breath. "If you’re a Bleever and still a male, and you’re wife is a Bleever and still a female, then I’m a Bleever and still a Shmoo. The verse in Galatians is not teaching that we lose our identities in Meshugah, but that there’s only one way to The Great God Mota for all people."

An extremely long pause, then "You mean I’m still Shmooish, too?"

"If you were born a Shmoo", I responded, "then you’re still a Shmoo, like the rest of us"

"What's it Too Yah!" he shouted over the airwaves, "they had told me I was no longer Shmooish".

So, if someone says "you can’t believe in Joozis and still be Shmooish" they need to read what the Shmooish Ishkibbibble teaches: YeShmua is our Meshugah and trusting in Him is the most Shmooish decision you can ever make.